The Correlation between Listening Strategy and Students’ Listening Achievement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32923/eedj.v3i1.3452Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between students' listening achievement and their listening approach. The participants in this study were 11th graders. 97 students served as the study's sample population. The data were analyzed using Pearson's r correlation coefficients in this descriptive quantitative study. Data were gathered for this study using a listening test and a questionnaire. Students' listening techniques were discovered using a questionnaire, and their listening abilities were discovered through a listening exam. 28 questions about cognitive, metacognitive, and socio-affective strategies were included in the questionnaire that the students were required to complete. According to the study's findings, there is a high association between the use of cognitive methods and successful listening. The link between socio-affective variables and listening achievement was significant with moderate interpretation, as was the correlation between metacognitive approach and listening achievement. Students' listening strategies and listening achievement at the school exhibit a substantial association, with rxy of cognitive strategy showing > = 0.622, metacognitive strategy showing > = 0.525, and socio-affective strategy showing > = 0.415. As a result, the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted and the null hypothesis (Ho) is disproved.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
EEdJ: English Education Journal is under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) License, according to which:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY 4.0) that allows the sharing of articles published with the acknowledgment of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2) The authors are authorized to make additional contracts separately for distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in an institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), as long as there is recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are authorized and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as it increases the impact and reference of the published work.
