The Impact of FOMO Culture and Digital Social Pressure on the Ethical Behavior of Young Consumers Toward Local Products

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32923/ejesh.v3i2.5992

Keywords:

FOMO, Social Media, Ethical Consumption, Generation Z, Local products, Algorithmic Capitalism

Abstract

The rise of social media and digital culture has reshaped how young consumers make moral decisions, particularly in purchasing local products. The phenomenon of Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) has emerged as a psychological driver that fuels impulsive and symbolic consumption among Generation Z. This study aims to analyse the extent to which digital social pressure and FOMO culture influence the ethical behaviour of young consumers when buying local products in the era of algorithmic capitalism. A qualitative conceptual approach was employed through a systematic literature review of relevant studies published between 2020 and 2025. The analysis followed a deductive–thematic process to explore the relationships among intrinsic moral motivation, digital social pressure, and ethical fading in consumer behaviour.

The findings reveal that while ethical awareness toward local products is increasing, social pressure and FOMO culture tend to shift consumers’ moral orientation from intrinsic values to extrinsic motivations based on trends and social validation. This phenomenon amplifies the attitude-behaviour gap and indicates a transformation of morality from personal reflection to algorithmic conformity. The study concludes that ethical consumer behaviour in the digital age must be understood as the outcome of an interaction between individual values, technological design, and social media pressure. It recommends enhancing digital moral literacy and encouraging local businesses to build authentic ethical narratives so that young consumers’ decisions remain grounded in moral awareness rather than transient digital trends.

References

Bocian, K., Gonidis, L., & Everett, J. A. C. (2024). Moral conformity in a digital world: Human and nonhuman agents as a source of social pressure for judgments of moral character. PLOS ONE, 19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298293

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide.

Butz, D. A. (2009). National Symbols as Agents of Psychological and Social Change. Political Psychology, 30(5), 779–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9221.2009.00725.X

Chaney, A. J. B., Stewart, B. M., & Engelhardt, B. E. (2018). How algorithmic confounding in recommendation systems increases homogeneity and decreases utility. Conference on Recommender Systems, 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240323.3240370

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Flecha-Ortiz, J. A., Santos-Corrada, M., Lopez, E., & Dones, V. (2023). Hedonic and Utilitarian Gratifications to the Use of TikTok by Generation Z and the Parasocial Relationships with Influencers as a Mediating Force to Purchase Intention. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 23(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2023.2195403

Hochstein, R. E., Veresiu, E., & Harmeling, C. M. (2024). Moralizing Everyday Consumption: The Case of Self-Care. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucae056

Lyons, A. C., Goodwin, I., Carah, N., Young, J. O., Barnes, A. M., & McCreanor, T. (2022). Limbic platform capitalism: understanding the contemporary marketing of health-demoting products on social media. Addiction Research & Theory, 31(3), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2022.2124976

Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/EBNURS-2019-103145

Nuhu, J. A., Adalıer, A., Özgit, H., & Kamyabi, M. (2025). Do Social Media Platforms Control the Sustainable Purchase Intentions of Younger People? Sustainability, 17(12), 5488. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125488

Ortová, N., Hejlova, D., & Weiss, D. (2023). Creation of a Code of Ethics for Influencer Marketing: The Case of the Czech Republic. Journal of Media Ethics, 38(2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2023.2193958

Rizomyliotis, I., Lin, C. R., Konstantoulaki, K., & Phan, T. Q. (2024). TikTok short video marketing and Gen Z’s purchase intention: evidence from the cosmetics industry in Singapore. Journal of Asia Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/jabs-04-2023-0138

Salinero, Y., Prayag, G., Gómez-Rico, M. F., & Molina-Collado, A. (2022). Generation Z and pro-sustainable tourism behaviors: internal and external drivers. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2022.2134400

Shah, D. M., Webster, E., & Kour, G. (2023). Consuming for content? Understanding social media-centric consumption. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113408

Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., Kushwah, S., & Salo, J. (2020). Behavioral reasoning perspectives on organic food purchase. Appetite, 154, 104786.

Zollo, L. (2024). Ethical identity, social image and sustainable fashion: still an impossible deal? A sociopsychological framework of ethical consumers’ attitude-behavior gaps. Journal of Consumer Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-08-2023-6213

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

The Impact of FOMO Culture and Digital Social Pressure on the Ethical Behavior of Young Consumers Toward Local Products. (2025). EJESH: Journal of Islamic Economics and Social, 3(2), 223-228. https://doi.org/10.32923/ejesh.v3i2.5992